Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To receive notifications about new content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to receive notifications about new content in PEP Web?   For more information about this feature, click here

To sign up to PEP Web Alert for weekly emails with new content updates click click here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Tuckett, D. (2003). Building A More Secure Basis for Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy: Conflicts in Sharing the Data. Brit. J. Psychother., 20(2):177-189.
    

(2003). British Journal of Psychotherapy, 20(2):177-189

Building A More Secure Basis for Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy: Conflicts in Sharing the Data*

David Tuckett

In 1995 the editors of the world's most distinguished medical journals made an important statement about what they thought should henceforth be considered ethical good practice when data from patients was disclosed in their publications.

First, bearing in mind what they considered the patient's interest, they stated that:

Patients have a right to privacy that should not be infringed without informed consent. Identifying information should not be published in written descriptions, photographs, and pedigrees unless the information is essential for scientific purposes and the patient (or parent or guardian) gives written informed consent for publication. Informed consent for this purpose requires that the patient be shown the manuscript to be published. (ICMJE 1995, italics added)

Second, bearing in mind what they considered the interests of good science, they added that:

Identifying details should be omitted if they are not essential, but patient data should never be altered or falsified in an attempt to attain anonymity. Complete anonymity is difficult to achieve, and informed consent should be obtained if there is any doubt. For example, masking the eye region in photographs of patients is inadequate protection of anonymity.… (ICMJE 1995, italics added)

Since 1999, following some debate, these requirements for informed consent have been included in these leading journals' instructions for authors and, when informed consent has been obtained, it has been indicated in the

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.