Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:

2015-11-06_11h09_55

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Scott, A. (2013). Editorial. Brit. J. Psychother., 29(3):273-275.

(2013). British Journal of Psychotherapy, 29(3):273-275

Editorial

Ann Scott

The immediate context for the opening paper in this issue of the Journal, Juliet Newbigin's ‘Psychoanalysis and homosexuality: keeping the discussion moving’, was a conference, held in January 2102 by the British Psychoanalytic Council, which agreed a position statement on homosexuality. To explore what necessitated the statement, Newbigin traces the history of psychoanalytic thinking on homosexuality from Freud's work to the normative approach of the post-war generation of analysts, acknowledging the emergence of a radical, clinical perspective on homosexuality over the last twenty years. She makes use of post-modern cultural theory, and recent analytic work on cultural and colour difference, to argue that clinicians now have an opportunity to ‘detect and question’ the theoretical bias that has produced a distorted view of the experience of lesbians and gay men. Her closely argued paper has already generated considerable interest, having been presented, in an earlier version, at the British Association of Psychotherapists (now part of the British Psychotherapy Foundation); more recently at a Foundation for Psychotherapy and Counselling Ethics Day; and at the Tavistock Clinic's Thinking Space. In publishing the paper the BJP is delighted to extend the debate.

Next, in our ‘Research’ section, Anne Ward, Barbara Wood and Masud Awal present findings from a substantive study within the Maudsley Psychotherapy Service. They are making a significant contribution to the literature on practice-based evidence.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.