Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To limit search results by article type…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Looking for an Abstract? Article? Review? Commentary? You can choose the type of document to be displayed in your search results by using the Type feature of the Search Section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Waska, R. (2013). Working to Understand Our Role in the Patient's Mind: Countertransference and the Problems of Immersion. Brit. J. Psychother., 29(4):466-480.

(2013). British Journal of Psychotherapy, 29(4):466-480

Working to Understand Our Role in the Patient's Mind: Countertransference and the Problems of Immersion

Robert Waska, LPCC, MFT, Ph.D.

To be fully helpful, in a way that respects both the internal and external needs and conflicts of our patients in analytic treatment, we must become immersed in their emotional perspective and have a feel for how they view and value themselves and their objects. Allowing ourselves to be carried into their inner phantasies and to be in touch with their strivings towards and away from love, hate, and knowledge is important in the analytic process. Countertransference is unavoidable but, if properly monitored and contained, it can provide a beneficial therapeutic device.

However, when treating disturbed patients who draw us into more paranoid transference states or primitive depressive position conflicts, we are often involved in various degrees of enactment. Even then, the countertransference, if carefully studied, can help us rebalance ourselves therapeutically and start to better understand how the patient is using us in their internal world and why they need to or desire to organize their object relational world in such terms. We cannot help but be immersed within the patient's unconscious belief system but, by being aware of our thoughts and feelings and reactions, we can keep our head above the

choppy countertransference waters enough to act out less and offer constant interpretations that are more informed and focused on the patient's unique and personal object relational conflicts and internal belief system.

From an object relational, post-Kleinian tradition, the author examines one case in depth. The patient consulted the analyst with concerns about her grown children and her perception of how damaged they were emotionally. The subsequent meetings involved intense transference and countertransference experiences that are explored. The author's approach builds on prior clinical understanding based on the Kleinian method (Waska, 2002, 2004, 2012, 2013).

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.