Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To zoom in or out on PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Are you having difficulty reading an article due its font size? In order to make the content on PEP-Web larger (zoom in), press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the plus sign (+). Press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the minus sign (-) to make the content smaller (zoom out). To go back to 100% size (normal size), press Ctrl (⌘Command on the Mac) + 0 (the number 0).

Another way on Windows: Hold the Ctrl key and scroll the mouse wheel up or down to zoom in and out (respectively) of the webpage. Laptop users may use two fingers and separate them or bring them together while pressing the mouse track pad.

Safari users: You can also improve the readability of you browser when using Safari, with the Reader Mode: Go to PEP-Web. Right-click the URL box and select Settings for This Website, or go to Safari > Settings for This Website. A large pop-up will appear underneath the URL box. Look for the header that reads, “When visiting this website.” If you want Reader mode to always work on this site, check the box for “Use Reader when available.”

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Scott, A. (2014). Editorial. Brit. J. Psychother., 30(1):1-3.

(2014). British Journal of Psychotherapy, 30(1):1-3

Editorial

Ann Scott

The BJP is very pleased to present a group of papers on theoretical orientations and their implications for clinical work, across this and the next two issues of the Journal. The papers derive from a series of presentations by senior clinicians at the British Association of Psychotherapists in 2009. As Kay Marles and Sally Rose put it in their Introduction to ‘Essentially Ours, Specifically …’, giving an account of the provenance of the project: ‘Could we listen to each other's approaches and ways of working in a spirit of receptivity and curiosity, or would our attachments to our own trainings and our convictions about our own orientations prove a stumbling block to open conversation and open minds?’ Each paper provides readers with an opportunity to immerse themselves in the idiom of a different approach - in this issue, Contemporary Freudian, Winnicottian, and Jungian. (The next issue will include papers on Klein and Anna Freud; the subsequent issue, papers on the Independent Tradition and on Internal Cohabitation.) The clinical work presented here ranges from long analyses in private practice, to weekly and short-term work in private practice, to weekly work in an outpatient perinatal psychiatric setting. Each paper offers a detailed account of how the clinician talked to their patient, and how the clinical exchanges were understood on reflection. In each case, it is possible to discern the links between an underlying theoretical stance and a clinical emphasis.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.