Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To download the bibliographic list of all PEP-Web content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Did you know that you can download a bibliography of all content available on PEP Web to import to Endnote, Refer, or other bibliography manager? Just click on the link found at the bottom of the webpage. You can import into any UTF-8 (Unicode) compatible software which can import data in “Refer” format. You can get a free trial of one such program, Endnote, by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Antonis, B. (2015). Controversial Discussions: Independent Women Analysts and Thoughts about Listening to Experience. Brit. J. Psychother., 31(1):96-106.

(2015). British Journal of Psychotherapy, 31(1):96-106

Controversial Discussions: Independent Women Analysts and Thoughts about Listening to Experience

Barbie Antonis

The aim of this paper is to identify central ideas described by Ella Freeman Sharpe, Marjorie Brierley and Sylvia Payne during the Controversial Discussions 1941-45 as presented in their Memoranda on Technique. These women, who have been described as the architects of the Middle Group (later renamed The Group of Independent Psychoanalysts) offer recommendations from their own clinical experience as psychoanalysts. I bring illustrations of their particular approaches relating to patients' history and experience. Each of these women took issue in certain ways with the concepts and assertions brought by Melanie Klein and Anna Freud and in articulating their reservations became positioned somewhat ‘independently’, bringing different emphases both conceptually and clinically. In the second part of the paper I ask how their ideas and recommendations may have influenced later psychoanalysts within the Independent Tradition such as Marion Milner, Enid Balint, Pearl King and Ann Hayman. My focus concerns the development of a theory of clinical technique that privileges what I term ‘listening to experience’. I highlight the contributions made by Michael Parsons whose writing has been central in giving voice to contemporary theorizing on the clinical technique of the Independent Tradition.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.