Tip: To see Abram’s analysis of Winnicott’s theories…
PEP-Web Tip of the Day
In-depth analysis of Winnicott’s psychoanalytic theorization was conducted by Jan Abrams in her work The Language of Winnicott. You can access it directly by clicking here.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Jools, P. Freeman, B. (2019). The Congress and the Confluence: Thoughts on the AIPCF Congress, Lyon, France, 26-28 July, 2018. Cpl. Fam. Psychoanal., 9(1):90-93.
(2019). Couple and Family Psychoanalysis, 9(1):90-93
The Congress and the Confluence: Thoughts on the AIPCF Congress, Lyon, France, 26-28 July, 2018
Penny Jools, Ph.D. and Brad Freeman
The International Association of Couple and Family Psychoanalysis (AIPCF) Eighth International Congress was held in 2018 in Lyon, France, in the Catholic University (a newly converted building from the old Saint-Paul prison), near the confluence of two great rivers, the Saône and the Rhône.
Three themes underpinned the “Argument” (“Couple and family history and stories in couple and family psychoanalysis”) for the Congress: the notion of technique in relation to the “here and now” vs “historical reconstruction”, the nature of trauma transmitted intergenerationally, and the importance of the couple and family sustaining a “negative capability” in order for the therapy to evolve creatively.
There were three strands to the congress programme: multilingual plenary sessions, bilingual round tables (in ten parallel sessions each day) and ten discussion groups held on the first and second days. The speakers for the plenary sessions and the respondents were mostly members of the scientific or administration committees of the AIPCF. Papers for the “round tables” were solicited to fit into one of the themes of the congress. Over the three days there were nineteen plenary sessions, ninety papers presented in a round table format, and ten discussion groups. The congress was well attended with over 300 participants, from many countries, although clinicians under the age of forty years seemed scarce.
As participants, its stated themes were less apparent to us than four theoretical tributaries: a slow steady undercurrent of object relations theory, a cross current of notions of attachment-informed observation, the choppy gaze of Lacanian meta-frameworks, and a powerfully emerging stream, that seemed to pour over all, stemming from Pichon-Rivière's link theory.
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the article. PEP-Web provides full-text search of the complete articles for current and archive content, but only the abstracts are displayed for current content, due to contractual obligations with the journal publishers. For details on how to read the full text of 2016 and more current articles see the publishers official website.]