Login
Gabbard, G.O. (2000). What Can Neuroscience Teach Us about Transference?. Canadian J. Psychoanal., 9:1-18.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(2000). Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis, 9:1-18

What Can Neuroscience Teach Us about Transference?

Glen O. Gabbard Author Information

Although the language of the mind and the language of the brain are quite distinct, we can nevertheless apply research from cognitive neuroscience to deepen our understanding of mechanisms associated with psychoanalytic thinking, such as transference. Neural network models provide a bridge between the disciplines. Inherent in neural network theory is the property of one-way transmission between neurons. Connections between neurons are modifiable through changes in their weight. Thus representations are ultimately formed in neural networks through the principle of associability—the idea that streams of information are combined by forming, strengthening, or pruning connections between them to form new representations that can later be retrieved. The introduction of two distinct memory systems has greatly increased the complexity of our understanding of transference. Both implicit declarative and implicit procedural elements can be found in transference. Moreover, applying research in cognitive neuroscience to the psychoanalytic notion of transference helps us to recognize that the notion of “the transference” is no longer valid. There are multiple transferences, each of which reflects different representations and different activations of neural networks. Finally, the mode of therapeutic action of psychoanalysis can be understood as involving the creation of new associative linkages accompanied by the relative deactivation of problematic links in activated networks.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.