Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: PEP-Web Archive subscribers can access past articles and books…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you are a PEP-Web Archive subscriber, you have access to all journal articles and books, except for articles published within the last three years, with a few exceptions.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Levin, C. (2000). The Siege of Psychotherapeutic Space: Psychoanalysis in the Age of Transparency. Canadian J. Psychoanal., 9(2):187-215.
    

(2000). Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis, 9(2):187-215

The Siege of Psychotherapeutic Space: Psychoanalysis in the Age of Transparency1

Charles Levin

The failure of the psychotherapeutic profession, and psychoanalysis in particular, to provide a consistent and coherent public account of the specialized nature of the psychotherapeutic relationship and setting has had harmful consequences for both the profession itself and for the public. Among the most serious of these consequences are (1) erosion and devaluation of confidentiality as a basic precondition of psychotherapy; (2) a tendency to conflate psychological and legal concepts and principles; (3) a tendency to think of psychotherapy as a form of redress or rehabilitation and a perhaps related tendency to think of the law as a form of social therapy; (4) the creation of misguided public expectations about what psychotherapists can fairly be asked to do without exceeding their mandate and what public authorities can be expected to do without overreaching the democratic limits on their powers and responsibilities.

The paper begins with a broad account of the roots in traditional society of the psychotherapeutic relationship, while emphasizing that psychoanalysis is a specifically modern institution that cannot survive for long outside a framework of law limiting the power of collective institutions over the individual. Following a schematic description of the different levels of the confidential relationship, the paper discusses the rise of the “therapeutic society” and the forces contributing to the attenuation of the working space in contemporary psychoanalytic and psychotherapeutic practice.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.