Tip: To search for text within the article you are viewing…
PEP-Web Tip of the Day
You can use the search tool of your web browser to perform an additional search within the current article (the one you are viewing). Simply press Ctrl + F on a Windows computer, or Command + F if you are using an Apple computer.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Usher, S. (2005). Illness in the Analyst: Implications for the Treatment Relationship edited by Harvey J. Schwartz and Ann-Louise Silver Madison, CT: International Universities Press, 1990, 339 pp.. Canadian J. Psychoanal., 13(2):363-368.
(2005). Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis, 13(2):363-368
Illness in the Analyst: Implications for the Treatment Relationship edited by Harvey J. Schwartz and Ann-Louise Silver Madison, CT: International Universities Press, 1990, 339 pp.
Review by: Sarah Usher
On a cold, bright afternoon in mid-February almost 3 years ago, my analyst announced at the beginning of our Monday session, “I have bad news about me.” He was smiling, or so I thought, so I smiled, too. “What's up?” I asked. Now, somewhat more soberly, “I've been diagnosed with lung cancer, and it looks like I may have some complications. We don't know how bad it is yet, but I'm meaning to do all I can to beat this.” Oh my God, I thought. I did not, of course, speak out loud. This is really serious. But he looks fine. How bad can it be? Four and a half months later he was dead.
Illness in the Analyst is a rare collection of articles and papers—written mostly from the perspective of analysts of adult patients—on the repercussions of their being suddenly struck with serious illness. The editors scoured the scant literature, which is reviewed by Schwartz in the middle of the book, and have included articles from as early as 1982 (Abend & Dewald). Schwartz states that becoming seriously ill may activate powerful fantasies of punishment, mutilation, and abandonment, and that the fact of physical injury, or of bodily impingement by surgery, may evoke fears from the Oedipal period or earlier. He describes the ill therapist, in fact, as experiencing a “rent in his own intrapsychic ‘container.’“
The stories in this book are very personal, describing the illnesses as they happened, the analysts' emotional reactions at the time, as far as they were aware, and their subsequent self-analyses of the defences of denial, disavowal, and intellectualization.
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]