Login
Zepf, S., Hartmann, S., Zepf, F.D. (2007). Constructivism in Psychoanalysis. Canadian J. Psychoanal., 15:3-21.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(2007). Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis, 15:3-21

Constructivism in Psychoanalysis

Siegfried Zepf , Sebastian Hartmann and Florian D. Zepf Author Information

The authors maintain that constructivism is a reappearance of the kind of subjective idealism proposed by Berkeley, and that in consequence of this, anthropology loses its historical context, individuals appear to have no memory, cannot learn from objects they are dealing with, and the concept of truth becomes devoid of its meaning. Constructivism is shown to be a highly problematical issue, particularly in psychoanalysis where patient and analyst are conceived as being wedded to a constantly unfolding present, resulting in the reversal of the central psychoanalytic paradigm—the past defines the present.

Les auteurs soutiennent que le constructivisme est une réémergence du type d'idéalisme subjectif proposé par Berkeley et qu'en conséquence, l'anthropologie perd son contexte historique; les individus semblent dénués de mémoire, ils ne peuvent tirer des enseignements des objets avec lesquels ils sont en relation et le concept de vérité perd son sens. Le constructivisme est présenté comme extrêmement problématique surtout en psychanalyse oò le patient et l'analyste sont conçus comme étant unis à un présent qui se déroule en permanence, conduisant à l'inversion du paradigme fondamental de la psychanalyse selon lequel c'est le passé qui définit le présent.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.