|Carveth, D.L. (2007). Lust by Michael Eigen; Middletown, ct: Wesleyan University Press, 2006, 118 pp.. Canadian J. Psychoanal., 15:194-197.|
Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.
If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.
If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.
(2007). Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis, 15:194-197
Lust by Michael Eigen; Middletown, ct: Wesleyan University Press, 2006, 118 pp.
In his latest book, Eigen offers us a freely associative discourse on the theme of lust. There is no organization into chapters, in fact there is little organization overall, with separate themes and aphorisms being marked only by
- 194 -
a kind of squiggle. “With all my might,” Eigen writes, “I try to keep things open” (p. 5). While it is true that a closed mind may be an impediment to understanding, might not the same be said of one that is excessively open? In his resistance to what he calls “hallucinated certainty,” Eigen seems to have fallen prey to hallucinated uncertainty: as against singularity, he celebrates multiplicity; against knowing, not knowing; against stasis, flow; against totality, the partial; against plenitude, lack. In other words, against the metaphysics of presence, he embraces, in typical postmodern fashion-thankfully increasingly out of fashion—a metaphysics of absence.
Although generally opposing anything that might threaten to limit the multiplicity of possible meanings, he opens with a definition: “Lust, one of the seven deadly sins, is part of what gives life luster, heightening existence” (p. ix). Allowing that it “can be degrading and part of a will to power, an assertion of dominance,” he argues that lust can also entail “an act of self-affirmation.” He confesses, “Since childhood I've wondered why ‘evil’ is ‘live’ spelled backward,”
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]