Login
Chabert, C. (2007). The Malaise of Culture and the Problem of the Superego. Canadian J. Psychoanal., 15:238-260.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(2007). Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis, 15:238-260

The Malaise of Culture and the Problem of the Superego

Catherine Chabert Author Information

The first idea that comes to mind regarding the links between culture and the superego, as these issues emerge in rereading Freud, is a clinical and metapsychological question: is there a real change in the demand for, and the indications for, treatment—determined in part by developments in the culture? Is it necessary to search for new analytic concepts in light of the contemporary clinical population, where depressive and narcissistic issues stand out, pointing inevitably to precarious boundaries, to a lack of differentiation between inside and outside. and thus, ultimately, to the way in which love relations with the primary object are established? In this context, the word boundaries needs to be understood in more than one sense: boundaries between me and other, in the sense of an intersubjective differentiation, that is to say between ego and object, but also boundaries within the psychic apparatus, between systems in the framework of the first topography [topographic model], between agencies in that of the

—————————————

This paper was first presented in French at the Annual Congress celebrating the 50th anniversary ofthe Canadian Psychoanalytic Society, 9 June 2007, Mont Tremblant, Quebec

1 Translated by Sylvie de Lorimier and Charles Levin. The translators have elected not to use Strachey's translation of Freud's famous title “Das Unbehagen in der Kultur.” Instead of the usual “Civilization and its Discontents,” we have adopted the French rendition, “Le malaise dans la culture,” which is closer to the original German.

2 In a few instances, including this one, the author uses the term moi without a definite article. This suggests that a connotation somewhere between the usual ego (le moi), and the deictic or pronominal sense of the reflexive term self, is intended. We have avoided wherever possible the term self in order not to get caught up in the strong essentialistic connotations of that term in Anglo-American psychoanalysis.

- 238 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.