Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To search for a specific phrase…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Did you write an article’s title and the article did not appear in the search results? Or do you want to find a specific phrase within the article? Go to the Search section and write the title or phrase surrounded by quotations marks in the “Search for Words or Phrases in Context” area.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Witenberg, E.G. (1974). Discussion. Contemp. Psychoanal., 10:369-371.

(1974). Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 10:369-371

Discussion

Earl G. Witenberg, M.D.

INCREASINGLY SINCE THE 1950's the impact of the patient on the analyst has been considered an area of valid study. With the reciprocal nature of relationships being generally accepted by analysts of all persuasions, with operationalism in full bloom, it became convincing that patients have impact on analysts in the same way that analysts have impact on patients. The discussions continue. The problem remains. How much of this impact does the analyst reveal, and how does he do it.

While Sullivan himself admonished us against sharing, e.g., feelings of anger, some of his formulations stand us in good stead. His concept of participant—observer is very useful in this respect. At any given moment in psychoanalysis there is a mix of these two aspects of our behavior. How much of each is determined by the goal of the treatment, that is, the uniquely analytic goal—the making available of hitherto inattended and dissociated aspects of the personality. Prior to the achievement of this goal, many factors come into play as a result of the process. They are the result of an explicit sharing of the reason for the mutual effort, the detailed anamnesis, the coming into touch with the core of the patient, the establishment of a cooperative relationship, the changes evoked in the analyst by the patient, and the change in behavior by the patient which is followed by the cognitive integration of the inattended and the dissociated—called insight. Throughout all this process the analyst is influenced by the power of the unconscious processes and attitudes of the patient.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.