Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To review an author’s works published in PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The Author Section is a useful way to review an author’s works published in PEP-Web. It is ordered alphabetically by the Author’s surname. After clicking the matching letter, search for the author’s full name.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Witenberg, E.G. (1977). The Inner Game of Psychoanalysis. Contemp. Psychoanal., 13:387-398.

(1977). Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 13:387-398

The Inner Game of Psychoanalysis

Earl G. Witenberg, M.D.

IT IS OF INTEREST TO SPECULATE about the factors involved in the growing study of the phenomena of countertransference.

As one views society as a whole, one sees increasing openness and candor in all sectors. Concomitant with this mixed blessing, there has been a diminution in the power of authority—whether it be religious or secular, as in the instance of the physician. The breakdown of institutions such as the family, sexual standards, and of government itself has been accompanied by a spate of literature that analyzes authority roles. Once analyzed, they are never the same.

Couple the social pressures ("man is the plaything of social forces defying both his will and his lethargy" [Schwartz, 1976] with the growing maturity of psychoanalysis and you have pressure on the profession to be more open. The widespread acceptance in our field of the fact that each of us can potentially be the other makes us aware of how similar we can be to our patients. We all are more accepting of human frailities than we used to be. It is openly acknowledged that professionals recognize how impossible it is to be a "blank mirror" or be absolutely neutral at all times. With the increasing diversity of the patient population (as indications for psychoanalysis have broadened), has come the realization of the utility of countertransference reactions. The use of face-to-face treatment added to the frequency of countertransference and brought it into fuller use. The seated patient does notice more than the lying one, and does have more of an impact on the analyst.

From the theoretical point of view the disillusionment with the explanatory force of metapsychology (after all—a theory about a theory) led to a push toward a theory of treatment independent of metapsychology.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.