Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To search for text within the article you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can use the search tool of your web browser to perform an additional search within the current article (the one you are viewing). Simply press Ctrl + F on a Windows computer, or Command + F if you are using an Apple computer.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Atkins, R.N. (1984). Transitive Vitalization and its Impact on Father-Representation. Contemp. Psychoanal., 20:663-676.

(1984). Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 20:663-676

Transitive Vitalization and its Impact on Father-Representation

Richard N. Atkins, M.D.

"IF WE SUPPOSE THAT PHYSICAL events can be reduced to spatial motion of material particles, we impose on the creations of thought the limitations of the visible and the tangible." So said Ernst Mach, the great Austrian aerodynamicist in 1894. Mach, a contemporary of Freud, was a de rigeur scientist. His name is now synonomous with speeds greater than sound. Yet, like Freud, Mach subscribed to that remarkable European blending of Naturwissenschaft and Geisteswissenschaft, philosophies of science that decry simple reductionism: not all that is observed is scientific, nor is science only that which is observable.

With this in mind, I intend this paper to be a contribution to the psychoanalytic study of early child-father relatedness. In it, I intend to show how a child, during infancy and toddlerhood, acquires a psychic representation, or mental image, of his father. I will pay less attention to what children and their fathers manifestly do with each other early in life, althoug, these periods of direct interaction are developmentally important. But, developmental psychoanalysis is not just the study of parent-child interaction. Rather it tries to understand the ontogeny of mental operations—in this case the way in which a child begins to think about his father.

Some might disagree with my approach. Experience, they might argue—or how and what a child and his father do together—and its mental registration are intrinsically wedded. Vital and reciprocal transactions between a father and his infant and toddler are, it is said, the meat and potatoes of any young child's father representation.

But, if we bear Mach's considerable caveat in mind, we would then impose upon the creation of a child's thought the limitations of the visible and the tangible.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.