Login
Langs, R. (1987). Psychoanalysis as an Aristotelian Science—Pathways to Copernicus and a Modern-Day Approach. Contemp. Psychoanal., 23:555-576.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1987). Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 23:555-576

Psychoanalysis as an Aristotelian Science—Pathways to Copernicus and a Modern-Day Approach

Robert Langs, M.D. Author Information

THE ISSUE OF THE SCIENTIFIC STATUS of psychoanalysis is of concern to us all. For the clinician, it is essential that psychoanalysis offer a foundation that meets accepted scientific standards. For his or her patients, the assurance of a scientific foundation to psychoanalysis promises the best possible cure available at the moment. And for the clinical researcher, there is a need to develop research approaches founded on a philosophy of science that promotes suitable forms of measurement, prediction, and perhaps above all, opportunity for new discoveries and advancement.

It is the main thesis of the present paper that psychoanalysis is in principle and in large measure—though of course, not entirely—an Aristotelian science. As such, it is primarily naturalistic, based on common sense observation and the statistical norm, concerned with the "essential nature" of the psyche's presumed elements, and intent on classifying those elements in terms of their apparent attributes and predetermined course of development. It is my intention to present arguments designed to reveal the Aristotelian spirit and philosophy at the heart of psychotherapeutic and psychoanalytic endeavor in both theory and practice. Because the history of

—————————————

0010-7530/87 $2.00 + .05

Copyright © 1987 W. A. W. Institute

20 W. 74th Street, New York, NY 10023

All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 24, No. 4 (1987)

1 This essay was written in response to Kurt Lewin's classic "The Conflict Between Aristotelian and Galileian Modes of Thought" (see page 517). I would like to thank my research assistant, Lenore Thomson, for her ideas and suggestions in the writing of this paper.

- 555 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.