Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: You can request more content in your language…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Would you like more of PEP’s content in your own language? We encourage you to talk with your country’s Psychoanalytic Journals and tell them about PEP Web.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Mitrani, J.L. (1995). On Adhesive Pseudo-object Relations Part Ii: Illustration. Contemp. Psychoanal., 31:140.

(1995). Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 31:140

On Adhesive Pseudo-object Relations Part Ii: Illustration

Judith L. Mitrani, Ph.D.

Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And when you look into the abyss, the abyss also looks into you.
Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil

NOT UNLIKE OTHER DISCOVERIES rooted in the observation of infants and children, the seminal work of Esther Bick (1968), (1986) on adhesive identification and her explication of the concept of the psychic skin" along with its functions have impacted our psychoanalytic understanding of the development of normal/narcissistic object relations and has led to some important technical considerations in the treatment of adult patients. The evolution and refinement of Bick's ideas, especially as they have been developed in the work of Donald Meltzer and his colleagues (1975a, 1975b) and Frances Tustin (1969), (1972), (1981), (1983), (1984a), (1984b), (1986), (1990), has led to the notion, presently under discussion, that there may be a mode of pseudo-object relating; it is markedly characterized by adhesive identity or adhesive equation rather than projective identification and may be considered as both prehistoric and pathogenetic to the normal/narcissistic object relations that have been so well defined and documented by Melanie Klein and her exponents. I have termed this phenomenon adhesive pseudo-object relations in the first of this pair of articles (Mitrani, 1994).

Having already compared and contrasted normal/narcissistic object relations with adhesive pseudo-object relations in the previous article, I will devote the present article to the illustration of this primitive way of being, an illustration derived not from clinical data, but from a literary work of art.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.