Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:

2015-11-06_09h28_31

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one).  Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper.  Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Feiner, A.H. (1996). Bewitched, Bothered, and Bewildered. Contemp. Psychoanal., 32:411-425.

(1996). Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 32:411-425

Bewitched, Bothered, and Bewildered

Arthur H. Feiner, Ph.D.

Traditionally, psychoanalysts have defined psychoanalysis by creating it, laying down rules and constraints, even rituals or ceremonies. With the flowering of interpersonalism in mid-century, by contrast, a new psychoanalysis came about through efforts to define it. Interpersonalists made conceptual as well as technical and practical changes. The ancestry of the leaders of the movement was obviously classical, but their interest in authenticity—that is, what they said they did was no different from what they did—didn't prevent them from outclassing their forebears. Since technique (along with practice) and theory are interdependent and interpenetrating, with one influencing the other, to split or separate them, i.e., to discuss them in isolation, would give a false impression of the interpersonal position.

Still, some of the basic canon never changed: concepts like unconscious processing, and, especially, the affecting power of resistance, transference, and countertransference (going on between analyst and patient out of awareness and shaping the interaction between them), and the

—————————————

1 This is the title of a song by R. Rodgers and L. Hart, from their production Pal Joey. It is sung by the female lead expressing, in most of the lyric, hopeless, helpless love for a con artist. Similarly, it's the feeling a child has for a conning or mystifying parent,

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.