Login
Yerushalmi, H. (1999). Mutual Influences in Supervision. Contemp. Psychoanal., 35:415-436.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1999). Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 35:415-436

Mutual Influences in Supervision

Hanoch Yerushalmi, Ph.D. Author Information

The Place of Knowledge in Therapy and Supervision

CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOANALYSTS are experiencing a crisis in their attitudes toward knowledge concerning the structure and development of the psyche and the meaning of various events in the therapy and life of the patient. There are a number of reasons for this development. First is the coexistence of many competing schools of thought and interpretive systems, each with its own principles and claims about objective truth (Mitchell, 1993). Second is a shift from a belief in the therapist's sole possession of truth to a view of the therapist as perceiving one of various possible truths about the patient's experience.

Mitchell has expressed one of the more firm views on this perception of the importance of theoretical knowledge: “Whereas earlier generations of psychoanalysts prided themselves on knowing and being brave enough to know, the current generation of psychoanalytic authors tend increasingly to stress the value of not knowing and the courage that it requires” (p. 42). Thus the state of not knowing has come to be perceived as the braver and more significant stance in therapy. Although therapists are still expected to acquire clinical, theoretical, and research knowledge, their use of this learning has changed. Application of theoretical knowledge to the understanding of the experiences, circumstances, and psychic structure of patients is much more tentative and cautious, and is informed by an awareness of the relativity and bias that characterizes all knowledge.

It is inevitable that such a profound change in the approach to knowledge in therapy must eventually alter perceptions of the concept of knowledge in supervision. This is relevant to understanding what actually occurs in therapy sessions, the significance of the therapeutic experiences of

—————————————

I wish to thank Malcolm Slavin, Ph.D., Jonathan Slavin, Ph.D., and Miki Rahmani, M. A. for their helpful comments on this essay.

- 415 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.