Login
Grey, A. (1999). A Prothalamion to the Wedding of Inspiration and Perspiration: An Interpersonal View of Human Creativity. Contemp. Psychoanal., 35:437-472.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1999). Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 35:437-472

A Prothalamion to the Wedding of Inspiration and Perspiration: An Interpersonal View of Human Creativity

Alan Grey, Ph.D. Author Information

ALTHOUGH THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN APPALLED at the very idea, Henry Ford and Sigmund Freud had more in common than the mere assonance of their names. It is that both chose standardization as the best strategy for the industries they created. In the heyday of the Model T, it was said that you could get a Ford in any color you wanted, as long as it was black. Similarly, analytic patients were free to aspire to whatever they wished, as long as it was at the stage of orgasmic genitality. A serious look into the historical record indicates that in its “classical” phase, the emphasis on standardized treatment procedures was more than a joke. Analysts were held to the so-called rule of neutrality, intended to exclude participation in the patient's experience. The only interventions permitted were carefully timed, laconic interpretations, and these statements were to be addressed to childhood instinctual strivings.

As for patients, their efforts were to be confined to following the “basic rule” of free association. As Fenichel (1945) explained, “the desired effect is more lastingly and efficaciously obtained the more the analyst succeeds in using no other means of eliminating resistances than the confronting of the patient's reasonable ego with the fact of his resistance and the history of its origin” (p. 571). The intention was to exclude “the purposive effects of the ego” (p. 570). These invariant procedures were quite consistent with the belief that emotional disorders arise from disruptions in a linear human developmental path that is set endogenously and driven by two animal instincts.

Starting from their distinctly different premises, interpersonal contemporaries of Fenichel could not seriously believe that procedures so uniform for all would be adequate to the therapeutic task. They found human needs, human modes of development, and styles of interpersonal relationship far more varied from one individual to another and from

- 437 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.