Login
Miller, L., Twomey, J.E. (1999). A Parallel Without a Process: A Relational View of a Supervisory Experience. Contemp. Psychoanal., 35:557-580.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1999). Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 35:557-580

A Parallel Without a Process: A Relational View of a Supervisory Experience

Linda Miller, M.S.W., LICSW and Jean E. Twomey, Ph.D. Author Information

PARALLEL PROCESS has long been considered a prominent concept in psychodynamic supervision. Its identification and use in the supervisory process has been thought by many to be valuable in promoting the understanding of the treatment under supervision. Theorists have begun to examine the supervisory situation from a perspective that incorporates some of the current relational thinking about the clinical encounter. There is a growing appreciation of the influence of the particular supervisor and the larger relational context on the supervision and understanding of the supervised treatments. The phenomenon known as parallel process, however, has not received much scrutiny in light of these newer perspectives. We believe that the concept is no longer a useful one, and cannot be maintained once a careful and detailed analysis of the supervisory exchange is undertaken.

Clinicians increasingly appreciate the complex relational aspects of such basic psychoanalytic concepts as transference, countertransference, and projective identification, giving detailed attention to the ways in which an individual's internal world is continually shaped and known through his interpersonal experiences, both past and present. Many therapists are less confident than in the past about their ability to stand outside of the clinical exchange and make objective observations about the patient or the therapeutic relationship. They are attempting to incorporate an awareness of the role of their own subjectivity, as it affects what they see, what it may mean, and how it influences the therapy as it evolves.

The concept of parallel process as a supervisory phenomenon is closely related to those of transference, countertransference, and projective identification.

—————————————

The authors would like to thank Deborah J. Woodford, Ph.D. for her careful reading and valuable comments on an earlier draft of this article.

- 557 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.