Login
Margulies, A. (1999). A Review Essay on Ritual and Spontaneity in the Psychoanalytic Process: A Dialectical-Constructivist View: Irwin Z. Hoffman. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, 1998. xxxii + 310 pp.. Contemp. Psychoanal., 35:699-712.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1999). Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 35:699-712

The End of Analysis? or, Our Postmodern Existential Situation

A Review Essay on Ritual and Spontaneity in the Psychoanalytic Process: A Dialectical-Constructivist View: Irwin Z. Hoffman. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, 1998. xxxii + 310 pp.

Alfred Margulies, M.D. Author Information

Revisiting a Classic

FOR MANY OF US, Irwin Hoffman's surprising — yet inevitable — 1991 paper introducing social constructivism seemed a manifesto for a fresh perspective. And what a surprise it was! Written as a reply to other papers (can you think of another discussion that had such an impact?), it established the epistemological underpinning for a new psychoanalytic metapsychology that had been gathering force for years. Something in the air — something we already almost knew — crystallized in a vision that was clear and whole in its dimensions. Hoffman saw its outlines, its philosophical commitments, its value; he understood the stakes on a deep level and, just in time, stated its principal features with clarity and elegance.

A different step is required, one that has to do specifically with the kind of knowledge that the participants are thought to have of themselves and of each other. The paradigm changes, in my view, only when the idea of the analyst's personal involvement is wedded to a constructivist or perspectivist epistemological position. Only in effecting that integration is the idea of the analyst's participation in the process taken fully into account. By this I mean, very specifically, that the personal participation of the analyst in the process is considered to have a continuous effect on what he or she understands about himself or herself and about the patient in the interaction. [p. 136]

- 699 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.