Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To receive notifications about new content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to receive notifications about new content in PEP Web? For more information about this feature, click here

To sign up to PEP Web Alert for weekly emails with new content updates click click here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Miller, L. Twomey, J.E. (2000). Incoherence Incognito: The Collapse Of The Third In A Fee-For-Service Structure. Contemp. Psychoanal., 36(3):427-456.
    

(2000). Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 36(3):427-456

Incoherence Incognito: The Collapse Of The Third In A Fee-For-Service Structure

Linda Miller, M.S.W. and Jean E. Twomey, Ph.D.

Certain Conceptual Problems are inherent in doing psychodynamic psychotherapy within the typical fee-for-service setting, a structure that has become increasingly common in the provision of outpatient psychotherapy services. Although there is a growing body of psychoanalytic literature on a number of issues involved in managed care as it affects the practice of psychodynamic psychotherapy, we have found no analytic discussion regarding a different aspect of the changing culture of the mental health care system in this country: namely, the shift from salaried to fee-for-service positions for clinicians practicing in outpatient clinics. Decisions by mental health clinics to pay the therapist in this manner are made for purposes of cost-savings and survival in an increasingly competitive marketplace. The particular clinical and theoretical implications of that arrangement for a psychodynamic treatment have not, to our knowledge, been examined.

We consider the structural and dynamic dilemmas in fee-for-service practice with respect to the presence of what is commonly termed the Third in analytic work, and highlight the problematic place of the therapist in relation to the analytic space and its frame. The problems we discuss here are most clearly seen in the circumstance of the absent patient, the missed appointment. We illuminate and give life to that issue through a clinical vignette. Because the flaws that we identify relate to the analytic space and to the context that holds the dyad, however, such problems are not limited to particular clinical circumstances, but simply manifest themselves most obviously in relation to the missed session.

For a number of reasons, this topic is significant to practitioners and supervisors of psychodynamic psychotherapy. Some of those reasons we mention here without elaboration, but not because they are insignificant.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.