Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see translations of Freud SE or GW…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When you hover your mouse over a paragraph of the Standard Edition (SE) long enough, the corresponding text from Gesammelte Werke slides from the bottom of the PEP-Web window, and vice versa.

If the slide up window bothers you, you can turn it off by checking the box “Turn off Translations” in the slide-up. But if you’ve turned it off, how do you turn it back on? The option to turn off the translations only is effective for the current session (it uses a stored cookie in your browser). So the easiest way to turn it back on again is to close your browser (all open windows), and reopen it.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Ringstrom, P. (2016). A review of The Interpersonal Tradition: The Origins of Psychoanalytic Subjectivity. Contemp. Psychoanal., 52(2):324-335.

(2016). Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 52(2):324-335

A review of The Interpersonal Tradition: The Origins of Psychoanalytic Subjectivity

Philip Ringstrom, Ph.D., Psy.D.

A review of The Interpersonal Tradition: The Origins of Psychoanalytic Subjectivity by Irwin Hirsch. New York, NY: Routledge, 2015. 222 pp.

It has been quite some time since I read a book as thought-provoking as Irwin Hirsch's The Interpersonal Tradition: The Origins of Psychoanalytic Subjectivity. Among its many significant contributions is its insistence that the interpersonal tradition is vastly underrecognized as foundational to the two-person psychology now in evidence in most contemporary psychoanalysis. Indeed, it serves as a textbook worthy of any psychoanalytic curriculum. I learned so much from it, I feel compelled to summarize some of its key points to encourage its readership.

Hirsch's book involves a compendium of chapters derived from over two decades of publications, each updated with a useful prologue. His volume not only provides a cogent history of interpersonal psychoanalysis, it also engages many other theories that are located within what is commonly called the “Big Tent of Relational Psychoanalysis,” capturing many key similarities as well as critically important differences between them. Using this background, he challenges our thinking about an array of topics such as analyzability, enactments, dissociation versus repression, the inescapable influence of the analyst's character in the treatment, the nature of human imperfection, and the assets and liabilities of taking up opposing positions in life.

To appreciate the origins of interpersonal psychoanalysis one needs to consider the historical context in which its originator, Harry Stack Sullivan, was writing.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.