Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To review the bibliography…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

It is always useful to review an article’s bibliography and references to get a deeper understanding of the psychoanalytic concepts and theoretical framework in it.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Feinberg, E. Malater, E. Webster, J. Royal, J. Poznansky, O. Wallerstein, H. (2015). Without History: An Experiment in Case Presentaion. DIVISION/Rev., 13:32-36.

(2015). DIVISION/Review, 13:32-36

Without History: An Experiment in Case Presentaion

Ezra Feinberg, PsyD, Evan Malater, Jamieson Webster, Jason Royal, Ph.D., Olga Poznansky and Hannah Wallerstein

On January 10, 2015, UNBEHAGEN: A Free Association for Psychoanalysis organized an experimental event in New York City. Its general purpose was to examine new ways to present psychoanalytic case material in a group meeting. What follows are comments from the members of the planning committee on the results of the experiment.


Case presentations in group or individual supervision generally follow the same format: The presenter shares process notes from one or more sessions, important events of the patient's childhood, a history of family and romantic relationships, medication history, history of the current treatment (duration, frequency), information about prior treatments, features and characteristics of the current treatment (including transference and countertransference issues and the patient's personality and character traits), job and relationship status, and, of course, psychological symptoms, including the patient's “presenting problems,” and the vicissitudes of those symptoms throughout the treatment.

Hrvoje Slovenc, Untitled II (Home Blessing), 2009

“Without History” grew out of a desire to question, investigate, critique, and play with this form. It also grew out of the planners' experience of case presentations in group or individual supervision as puzzles to be solved. Symptoms are fit like pieces into a case history, or vice versa, all via process notes and discussion (including parallel process) and-voila-the puzzle is solved through the trusty process of group or individual supervision.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.