Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see definitions for highlighted words…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Some important words in PEP Web articles are highlighted when you place your mouse pointer over them. Clicking on the words will display a definition from a psychoanalytic dictionary in a small window.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Radical Science Collective (1984). Editorial. Free Associations, 1A(Pilot):5-7.

(1984). Free Associations, 1A(Pilot):5-7

Editorial

Radical Science Collective

Free Associations is the 15th in the Radical Science series at the same time that it is the pilot issue of a new journal of the same name with the subtitle: Psychoanalysis, Groups, Politics, Culture.

The need for a journal on the wider cultural relations of psychoanalysis, psychotherapy and psychology has been felt for a long time. Indeed, Free Associations revives a way of thinking about psychoanalysis which was widespread in the pre-World War II period and which has been eclipsed by professionalisation and sectarianism.

The idea for a journal grew out of the work of the Radical Science Collective as part of a wider project, critically to examine science, technology, medicine and other forms of expertise and to make them more accessible and publicly accountable. It has been a central feature of our radical science approach to argue that a space must be made for reflexivity and subjectivity in scientific culture. For it is a consequence of the very scientism which insulates the objects of knowledge from their human sources that a polarisation has occurred between traditional perspectives. That is, Marxism has become the critique of social and economic forces and structures, and psychoanalysis the attempt to reclaim the individual subject. There has been an implicit recognition within both traditions of their limitations — in the attempt to find a subject in Marx's early work on alienation and in the attempt to understand the social resonances of intrapsychic conflicts in psychoanalysis. Both cultures have tried to find ways of expressing the unresolvable conflicts within a whole which gives them meaning and hope.

Many of those politically active in radical and women's politics in the 1960s and 70s have found themselves getting involved with aspects of psychoanalysis, psychotherapy and related matters — some through their own distress, some through having suffered the destructive effects of the psychodynamics of group processes in their political work, many through the psychoanalytic critique of traditional and old left politics. Some professional therapists feel restricted by the lack of a philosophical and broader cultural dimension to their psychoanalytic theory and practice.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.