Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see translations of Freud SE or GW…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When you hover your mouse over a paragraph of the Standard Edition (SE) long enough, the corresponding text from Gesammelte Werke slides from the bottom of the PEP-Web window, and vice versa.

If the slide up window bothers you, you can turn it off by checking the box “Turn off Translations” in the slide-up. But if you’ve turned it off, how do you turn it back on? The option to turn off the translations only is effective for the current session (it uses a stored cookie in your browser). So the easiest way to turn it back on again is to close your browser (all open windows), and reopen it.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Jordanova, L.J. (1985). Fantasy and History in the Study of Childhood. Free Associations, 1C(2):110-122.

(1985). Free Associations, 1C(2):110-122

Fantasy and History in the Study of Childhood

L. J. Jordanova

Dream Babies: Child Care from Locke to Spock, by Christina Hardyment, Jonathan Cape, 1983, Pp. xvii + 334, £9.95

The literature on the history of childhood is now immense. It represents a wide range of theoretical perspectives, including psychohistory, economic determinism, demography, and the study of mentalités. There are deep divisions between different schools of thought which now seem to be gathering under two principal umbrellas: the first covers those who argue that there are fundamental continuities across time and cultures with respect to parent-child relations, while the second argues that such fundamental human experiences are socially and culturally constructed, so that any expectations of continuities are inherently implausible. The first position is now in the ascendancy, bolstered by arguments derived from sociobiology (Pollock), developmental psychology (Tucker) and anthropology (Wilson). The second position, that taken by much of the pioneering work in the field, is under heavy attack on both theoretical and empirical grounds. Some of this work was undertaken within an explicitly psychoanalytic framework, and much of the criticism of it must be understood as an attack on a particular version of psychohistory and especially that associated with Lloyd de Mause and the History of Childhood Quarterly, now renamed the Journal of Psychohistory. It is perhaps ironic that the position one might expect to be associated with psychoanalysis, that there are certain universals in family dynamics, is in fact the springboard from which psychohistory has been most vigorously attacked.


[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.