Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To sort articles by author…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

While performing a search, you can sort the articles by Author in the Search section. This will rearrange the results of your search alphabetically according to the author’s surname. This feature is useful to quickly locate the work of a specific author.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Paskauskas, R.A. (1988). Freud's break with Jung: the crucial role of Ernest Jones. Free Associations, 1(11):7-34.

(1988). Free Associations, 1(11):7-34

Freud's break with Jung: the crucial role of Ernest Jones

R. Andrew Paskauskas

Literature and Sources

In the summer of 1912 Ernest Jones put forward a proposal to Freud for the formation of a Secret Committee that was to watch over the development of psychoanalysis and provide a source of comfort to Freud in times of severe dissent (Jones, 1955, p. 152). Within a year the membership of the Committee was established. Apart from Freud and Jones, the first members included Otto Rank, Sandor Ferenczi, Karl Abraham and Hans Sachs. In May 1913 Freud presented the members with a Greek intaglio, which eventually each member had mounted on a ring to serve as a symbol of their unity.

Jones's proposal made no mention of Carl Jung as a possible member of the Committee, even though Jung and Freud had not yet severed their ties and Jung was still president of the International Psycho-Analytical Association. This was politically significant. The exclusion of Jung from membership of the Secret Committee was the first of a series of events leading up to a crucial shift in power within the psychoanalytic movement in 1914, when Jones displaced Jung in the power structure.

The issue of Jung's exclusion from Freud's inner secret circle is not mentioned by Jones in his historical writings (Jones, 1945, 1954, 1955, 1959; Evans, 1964). Furthermore, in the second volume of his biography of Freud, Jones discussed the Secret Committee in a separate chapter (Jones, 1955, pp.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.