Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
PEP-Easy Tip: To save PEP-Easy to the home screen

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To start PEP-Easy without first opening your browser–just as you would start a mobile app, you can save a shortcut to your home screen.

First, in Chrome or Safari, depending on your platform, open PEP-Easy from You want to be on the default start screen, so you have a clean workspace.

Then, depending on your mobile device…follow the instructions below:


  1. Tap on the share icon Action navigation bar and tab bar icon
  2. In the bottom list, tap on ‘Add to home screen’
  3. In the “Add to Home” confirmation “bubble”, tap “Add”

On Android:

  1. Tap on the Chrome menu (Vertical Ellipses)
  2. Select “Add to Home Screen” from the menu


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Wieland, C. (1988). Femininity as neurosis. Free Associations, 1(13):48-58.

(1988). Free Associations, 1(13):48-58

Femininity as neurosis

Christina Wieland

The Feminist Legacy of Karen Horney, by Marcia Westcott, New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press, 1986, 242 pages, £17.50

Fifty years after Freud's admission of his inability to draw any final conclusions on femininity, the question remains largely unresolved. After the impasse of the ‘great debate’1 of the 1920s and 30s and the uneasy silence that followed, during which psychoanalysis and psychology investigated child development paying little attention to sex differences, the subject is back with equal force and urgency. The last ten years have witnessed a spate of books on feminine development and, faced with yet another book and yet another theory, one feels the need to put it into a wider perspective.

Broadly speaking, theories of femininity fall into two categories. In the first category belong those books which assume an essential femininity which is biologically determined and which stands in opposition to a biologically determined masculinity. In this model masculinity and femininity are seen as complementary opposites. Jungian theory is an example of this, but such diverse theories as Karen Horney's, Melanie Klein's and Ernest Jones's also fall into this category. Some feminist writers also belong here, Simone de Beauvoir being a notable example. Some of these theories (Jung, Klein) bypass the social world as irrelevant, while others (Horney, de Beauvoir) treat it as a force oppressing natural femininity.


[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.