Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see translations of Freud SE or GW…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When you hover your mouse over a paragraph of the Standard Edition (SE) long enough, the corresponding text from Gesammelte Werke slides from the bottom of the PEP-Web window, and vice versa.

If the slide up window bothers you, you can turn it off by checking the box “Turn off Translations” in the slide-up. But if you’ve turned it off, how do you turn it back on? The option to turn off the translations only is effective for the current session (it uses a stored cookie in your browser). So the easiest way to turn it back on again is to close your browser (all open windows), and reopen it.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Scott, A. (1989). A question of judgement: ‘He was a Cabinet Minister and I was merely a candidate’. Free Associations, 1Q(16):106-117.

(1989). Free Associations, 1Q(16):106-117

A question of judgement: ‘He was a Cabinet Minister and I was merely a candidate’

Ann Scott

A Question of Judgement, by Sara Keays, Quintessential Press, 1985, 320 pages, £9.95

I have had an interest in Sara Keays and her significance for public debates around power and sexuality ever since her statement to The Times in October 1983. There she did more than put her side of the story of her relationship with MP Cecil Parkinson: she challenged the hypocrisy of newspapers like the Daily Telegraph, which felt that a discreet abortion was ‘greatly to be preferred’ to a scandal. ‘I was not aware’, she wrote then, ‘that political expediency was sufficient grounds for an abortion under the 1967 Act’ (The Times, 14 October 1983). The Times leader column, for its part, acknowledged that Keays had squarely faced the issue of the double standard in matters of sexual morality, especially in political life. The editorial, while circumspect in tone, implied the need for urgent public debate about morality for a time like the present, in which women were entitled to pursue their own careers without sacrificing their wishes for a personal life too. For it is now well known that Sara Keays has lost her chances of a parliamentary career. But as a result of … what exactly? Her refusal to go for a discreet abortion; her refusal, by writing A Question of Judgement, to maintain a permanently dignified silence; her clever timing in coming to an agreement with the Daily Mirror to serialize her book during the Tory Party conference of 1985 — all these are mentioned, in hostile notices, as evidence of Keays's vindictive bitterness, the ‘classic’ behaviour of a woman scorned.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.