Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To receive notifications about new content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to receive notifications about new content in PEP Web? For more information about this feature, click here

To sign up to PEP Web Alert for weekly emails with new content updates click click here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Hughes, J.M. (1991). Psychoanalysis as a general psychology, revisited. Free Associations, 2(3):357-370.

(1991). Free Associations, 2(3):357-370

The Psychoanalytic Movement

Psychoanalysis as a general psychology, revisited

Judith M. Hughes

My paper focuses on the émigrées from Vienna. Why, you may ask, turn once more to them, more particularly to Heinz Hartmann and Erik Erikson? There are a number of answers one might give, each of which would provide a lens for examining the subject. What I want to do is to take an ‘internalist’ approach, to concentrate on the logic of theory itself — admittedly at the expense of the personal, the social and the institutional. What concerns me is where Hartmann and Erikson were coming from, intellectually that is, what objectives they set themselves, what theoretical strategies and tactics they devised and whether more than a generation later — to continue the military metaphor — their campaign plans are still operational.

I should say a word about where I am coming from. I have approached psychoanalytic ego psychology by a curious route, by way of Britain. Over the last decade and a half I first applied and then studied — another curious sequence — British object-relations theory.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.