Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see Abram’s analysis of Winnicott’s theories…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

In-depth analysis of Winnicott’s psychoanalytic theorization was conducted by Jan Abrams in her work The Language of Winnicott. You can access it directly by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Figlio, K. (1993). Commentaries on ‘The mirror and the hammer’. Free Associations, 3(4):594-603.

(1993). Free Associations, 3(4):594-603

Commentaries on ‘The mirror and the hammer’ Related Papers

Karl Figlio

During a symposium on countertransference, Donald Winnicott said to Michael Fordham:

Incidentally, may I remind Dr Fordham that some of the terms he uses are not of any value to me because they belong to the jargon of Jungian conversation. He in turn can tell me which of my words are useless to him. I refer to: transpersonal, transpersonal unconscious, transpersonal analytic ideal, archetypal, the contra-sexual components of the psyche, the animus and anima, animusanima conjunction.

I cannot be communicated with in this language. For some in this hall these are household words, and for the rest they have no precise meaning (Winnicott, 1960, p. 159)

A few years later, Winnicott said:

In our theory it is necessary to allow for both a male and a female element in boys and men and girls and women … These considerations have involved me then in a curious statement about the pure male and the pure female aspects of the infant boy or girl (Winnicott, 1966, pp.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.