Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To search for text within the article you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can use the search tool of your web browser to perform an additional search within the current article (the one you are viewing). Simply press Ctrl + F on a Windows computer, or Command + F if you are using an Apple computer.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Temperley, J. (1993). Is the Oedipus complex bad news for women?. Free Associations, 4(2):265-275.

(1993). Free Associations, 4(2):265-275

Theory

Is the Oedipus complex bad news for women?

Jane Temperley

There has been a lengthy dialogue between psychoanalysis and feminism. In its more recent phase, during the last twenty or thirty years, Freud was at first often seen as the bastion and exemplar of prejudice against women. Then, largely via Lacan, the very theories of the castration complex and phallic monism, which had caused such objection among feminists, were seen instead to illuminate the position of women in a society which is structured by patriarchy in its language, thought and sense of individual identity. Classical psychoanalytic ideas about the castration complex were seen as providing an explanation of why, at levels far removed from conscious rationality, women are perceived, not as inferior, but as disadvantaged and marginalized. Psychoanalysis was turned to for help to explain the depth and intractability of the attitudes which disadvantaged and often disparaged women.

What

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.