Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
PEP-Easy Tip: To save PEP-Easy to the home screen

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To start PEP-Easy without first opening your browser–just as you would start a mobile app, you can save a shortcut to your home screen.

First, in Chrome or Safari, depending on your platform, open PEP-Easy from You want to be on the default start screen, so you have a clean workspace.

Then, depending on your mobile device…follow the instructions below:


  1. Tap on the share icon Action navigation bar and tab bar icon
  2. In the bottom list, tap on ‘Add to home screen’
  3. In the “Add to Home” confirmation “bubble”, tap “Add”

On Android:

  1. Tap on the Chrome menu (Vertical Ellipses)
  2. Select “Add to Home Screen” from the menu


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Bacciagaluppi, M. (1994). Daniel Burston, The Legacy of Erich Fromm Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press, 1991, xi+260 pages, hb £23.95. Free Associations, 4(4):618-625.

(1994). Free Associations, 4(4):618-625

Daniel Burston, The Legacy of Erich Fromm Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press, 1991, xi+260 pages, hb £23.95

Review by:
Marco Bacciagaluppi

The authoritarian structure of orthodox psychoanalysis has led to the explicit or implicit ostracism of many of its practitioners. Fromm shared this fate with Ferenczi and many others. I mention Ferenczi in particular because of the close links between these two authors. They shared several character traits, such as independence of mind and a loving approach, and these were the very traits which led to their banishment. This ostracism was effective in both cases, as regards professional circles. As Heynal and Falzeder (1991) remark, for several years after Ferenczi's death his work ‘fell into oblivion’ in orthodox circles (p. 17). As for Fromm, Roazen (1989) speaks of his ‘de facto excommunication’ on the part of the psychoanalytic community. Fromm, however, also differed from Ferenczi in important respects: he was very pugnacious and outspoken in his critique of authority, and he had a much wider cultural background. These factors allowed him to circumvent the excommunication and reach out to the general reading public, and in so doing also to take up Ferenczi's defence on many occasions. Burston's book is an opportunity for the psychoanalytic community to reassess an author who could greatly contribute to a revitalization of psychoanalysis, but has hitherto been prevented from doing so.

Fromm's Work

Fromm is generally labelled a ‘neo-Freudian’, together with Karen Horney, Harry Stack Sullivan and Clara Thompson. As Burston states at the very beginning of his book, this definition is restrictive, despite Fromm's close personal ties to the other neo-Freudians, and his involvement, together with Sullivan and Thompson, in the founding of the William Alanson White Institute in New York.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.