Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:

2015-11-06_11h09_55

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Young, R.M. (1995). The vicissitudes of transference and countertransference: the work of Harold Searles. Free Associations, 5(2):171-195.

(1995). Free Associations, 5(2):171-195

Issues

The vicissitudes of transference and countertransference: the work of Harold Searles

Robert M. Young

“Why Harold Searles?” you ask. Some of you may have come because you have an answer of your own and are curious about mine. I dare say, however, that by far the larger number came because of the phrase “the vicissitudes of transference and countertransference” and hoped that Searles or I might have something to say that sheds light on this flavor on the month. I hope you won't be disappointed.

When I say “flavor of the month,” I mean that countertransference is everywhere these days. One begins with the two classic texts: Heinrich Racker's Transference and Countertransference (1968) and Searles'.Countertransference and Related Subjects (1979).

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.