Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:

2015-11-06_11h09_55

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Holmes, J. (1996). Bowlby, Fairbairn, and Sutherland: the Scottish connection in psychotherapy. Free Associations, 6(3):351-378.

(1996). Free Associations, 6(3):351-378

Bowlby, Fairbairn, and Sutherland: the Scottish connection in psychotherapy

Jeremy Holmes

Introduction

The scene: the canteen at the Tavistock Clinic. The time: the late 1980s. The characters: John Bowlby and Jock Sutherland, close friends for half a century, now in their late seventies and early eighties respectively (silver-haired, vigorous, one on the small side, the other very tall) distinguished, successful, balanced, clever men; sitting face to face, deep in conversation. John, the more serious, meets Jock's eye with its eternal twinkle, wags his finger, says Jockyou know that is a post-Freudian statement! (Haldane, 1993).

One aim of this paper is to explore what a ‘post-Freudian statement’ might mean, and to look at Bowlby and Sutherland's contribution to a ‘post-Freudian’ state of affairs. I shall approach the subject via the theme of splitting, which can be either creative or pathological. Using Kuhn's (1962) well-known distinction between the discovery of new paradigms and what he calls ‘normal science’ I shall argue that innovative thought often requires a degree of splitting and isolation as necessary precursors of creativity and discovery. By contrast, during the phase of normal science, isolation becomes stultifying and retards progress. The contrasting and complementary personalities of Bowlby and Sutherland epitomise the two aspects of innovation and the consolidation.

I

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.