Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To limit search results by article type…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Looking for an Abstract? Article? Review? Commentary? You can choose the type of document to be displayed in your search results by using the Type feature of the Search Section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Vida, J.E. Molad, G.J. (2004). The Ferenczian Dialogue: Psychoanalysis as a Way of Life. Free Associations, 11(3):338-352.

(2004). Free Associations, 11(3):338-352

The Ferenczian Dialogue: Psychoanalysis as a Way of Life1

Judith E. Vida, M.D. and Gershon J. Molad, M.A.

Introduction

Psychoanalysis and Life, the way psychoanalysis and life relate to one another, is a deep, real issue in a Ferenczian conference, where we always enter a two-fold personal and historical field, a field that is at the same time a fierce and bloody battleground and a lovers' lustful meadow. In such a field, ‘life’ and ‘psychoanalysis’ nurse and bite each other in a mutual, ever-unresolved dependence, right in our face, but, being in conference, we will act as though we maintain a comfortable distance: after all, we are in conference, listening to lectures and ‘case-presentations’. But, you know what? This distance is only an illusion. We are a participant audience here, and listening is actually personal for all of us. It touches on how each of us presents our own autobiography, how we create and guard our identities (the personal and the professional), and it touches on the pride and fear of what we sometimes call ‘countertransference’, which is the core of participant listening, not only of clinical work, but also of conference work.

Making this kind of participant visit yields a variety of personal reactions and impressions. For instance, Jacobs, a veteran visitor, in a recent review of‘the major trends and developments in the evolution of the concept of countertransference’, begins with Freud's view of countertransference as an interference with ‘the work’ that must be mastered by the analyst.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.