Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To sort articles by year…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

After you perform a search, you can sort the articles by Year. This will rearrange the results of your search chronologically, displaying the earliest published articles first. This feature is useful to trace the development of a specific psychoanalytic concept through time.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Zepf, S. (2012). A Stroke of Genius?. Free Associations, 13(1):83-95.

(2012). Free Associations, 13(1):83-95

Wilfred R. Bion's Psychoanalysis

A Stroke of Genius?

Siegfried Zepf

The author investigates whether it is appropriate to bestow the epithet “genius” on Bion, as Grotstein and others have done. He finds that Bion's conceptualization of psychoanalysis as a process of mutual projective identifications is untenable and that Bion's own epistemological perspective would regard his claims to be lies and falsehoods. The author argues that the term “genius” is not supported by the intellectual quality of Bion's work but seems to be due to his authoritarian-dogmatic style, which precludes critical assessment and presumes that his conceptualizations are indisputable. Since Bion's often cryptic statements are difficult to understand, they appear similar to ‘messages from the gods’ (Thompson) and produce the impression that the breadth and depth of an earth-shaking work have yet to be fully grasped. Therefore, the author finds support for the claim that Bion is a “genius” to be lacking; rather, this assertion appears to be the product of a socio-psychological phenomenon.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.