Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To save articles in ePub format for your eBook reader…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To save an article in ePub format, look for the ePub reader icon above all articles for logged in users, and click it to quickly save the article, which is automatically downloaded to your computer or device. (There may be times when due to font sizes and other original formatting, the page may overflow onto a second page.).

You can also easily save to PDF format, a journal like printed format.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Krüger, S. (2013). How Far Can I Make My Fingers Stretch? A Response to Vivian Sobchack's ‘What My Fingers Knew’ from a Depth-Hermeneutic Perspective. Free Associations, 14(1):104-131.

(2013). Free Associations, 14(1):104-131

How Far Can I Make My Fingers Stretch? A Response to Vivian Sobchack's ‘What My Fingers Knew’ from a Depth-Hermeneutic Perspective

Steffen Krüger

By reviewing the acclaimed film scholar Vivian Sobchack's existential phenomenological approach to film interpretation against the background of Alfred Lorenzer's depth-hermeneutic cultural analysis - a psychoanalytically oriented approach - this paper will not only unfold a critical social dimension in Sobchack's concern of film and film critique, but also work out the points of contact in the two approaches. My attempt to understand and criticize Sobchack through Lorenzer thus aims first and foremost at cross-fertilization of the fields of psychoanalytically and phenomenologically oriented research. Bringing the central aspects of Lorenzer's conception of depth hermeneutic face to face with parallel lines of thought in Sobchack's ‘What my fingers knew - The Cinesthetic Subject, or Vision in the Flesh’, one of her central methodological statements, I will unfold how this critical social dimension has been present in her methodological conception all along. In closely following Sobchack's notion of the chiasmatic ‘third term’, I argue that it is within the experience of a scenic, embodied response to film itself that this dimension can be retrieved.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.