Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To refine search by publication year…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Having problems finding an article? Writing the year of its publication in Search for Words or Phrases in Context will help narrow your search.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Mitchell, J. (2006). From Infant to Child: The Sibling Trauma, the Rite de Passage, and the Construction of the “Other” in the Social Group. Fort Da, 12(2):35-49.

(2006). Fort Da, 12(2):35-49

From Infant to Child: The Sibling Trauma, the Rite de Passage, and the Construction of the “Other” in the Social Group

Juliet Mitchell

Why [is it] that where literature, life, and memory remind us how significant were those hours, days, years we spent with brothers, sisters and friends, when we put on our academic hats, we forget.

Weissner and Gallimore, 1977

Postmodernism has made us sensitive to the constructions of sameness and difference, the subject and the other. Attention to violence and trauma has made us aware of the way the “other” is the focus of hostility through the human proclivity for projection and representation, or the “other” is created in order to be the hostile object.

For me, personally, the status of the “other” broke somewhat differently on my consciousness, long before postmodernism, when as a student I read Simone de Beauvoir's (1952) The Second Sex and discovered that I was, as a woman, the very site of a primal alterity — woman was the place where (with her connivance) man deposited all that he did not want about the limitations of humanity. The experience was bewildering as it is psychologically impossible to be only and entirely “other” from one's own position. Perhaps it is because of this early sensation that I find the question of “othering” as an abstract concept vertiginous, and my contribution here is consequently prosaic, down-to-earth. I suggest childhood sibling relations are an important place where we negotiate “self” and “other” but also where we, or through whom we, construct the “other” of ourselves, our unconsciousness, the it (or id) which cuts across self and subjecthood, locating us forever elsewhere than in our “selves.”

In opposing the grand narratives of modernism, the postmodern focussed on criticising notions of universality and the concern with origins.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.