Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see author affiliation information in an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To see author affiliation and contact information (as available) in an article, simply click on the Information icon next to the author’s name in every journal article.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Fisher, C.P. (2006). Impossible Training: A Relational View of Psychoanalytic Education By Emanuel Berman, Hillsdale, N. J. and London: The Analytic Press, 2004; 279 pp.. Fort Da, 12(2):79-87.

(2006). Fort Da, 12(2):79-87

Book Reviews

Impossible Training: A Relational View of Psychoanalytic Education By Emanuel Berman, Hillsdale, N. J. and London: The Analytic Press, 2004; 279 pp.

Reviewed by
Charles P. Fisher, M.D.

Emanuel Berman's book calls for dramatic changes in psychoanalytic education. The most notable are radical corrections of the power dynamics that have afflicted psychoanalytic training institutions in the past. Starting with Freud and his Secret Committee, the society of the secret ring, top-down power dynamics have led to paranoid and realistic fears among psychoanalytic candidates and, all too often, the creation of what Berman calls a “false analytic self.”

Impossible Training is more than a book about psychoanalytic education, although it is certainly valuable for anyone involved in psychoanalytic training as an educator or a student. Many readers will appreciate this book for its insightful view of contemporary problems in psychoanalytic education, and for its intelligent recommendations for reform. However, the real power of the book lies in the fact that Berman's ideas about psychoanalytic education are grounded in a thoughtful systematic view of psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic training. In fast-moving chapters, full of clinical examples and provocative ideas, Emanuel Berman assembles a coherent account, integrating contributions to psychoanalytic theory, history, epistemology, methodology, and clinical theory with a study of psychoanalytic institutions and training. Berman's stance is relational in a broad sense of the word — he adds a relational point of view to his overall examination of psychoanalytic theory, rather than rewriting or erasing pre-existing models.

In this review, I'll try to summarize and evaluate Berman's major contributions, but first a few general observations. An outstanding characteristic throughout is that Berman is both innovative and respectful of history.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.