Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To keep track of most popular articles…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can always keep track of the Most Popular Journal Articles on PEP Web by checking the PEP tab found on the homepage.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Gorin, S. (2018). Tales of Love and Darkness: Narrating the Self. Fort Da, 24(2):70-81.

(2018). Fort Da, 24(2):70-81

Tales of Love and Darkness: Narrating the Self

Shlomit Gorin, M.A.

One need not be a chamber to be haunted;

One need not be a house;

The brain has corridors surpassing

Material place.

— Emily Dickinson, “LXIX Part 4, Time and Eternity” (1891)

Examining the nature of autobiography requires grappling with myriad ways that dynamics of memory affect, and are affected by, perceptions and constructions of the self. The autobiography of Israeli writer Amos Oz, A Tale of Love and Darkness (2004), provides a rich medium through which to explore the relationships between a writer, the nature of memory, and self-expression. This tale challenges us to explore the complicated, revealing ways in which our self-constructions and memories inform one another. Our notions of our selves in relation to the memories we hold onto — and that hold onto us — are neither fixed nor reliably compatible with the ways we wish to see and experience ourselves. Consciously and unconsciously, we curate our memories and our narratives as they collide or blend with the competing forces of our needs and desires and their attendant defenses and vulnerabilities. Denial and delusion duel with acknowledgement and honesty, arbitrariness spars with purpose, pain wrangles with gain.

Essayist and autobiography specialist Philippe Lejeune (1989) asserts, “Telling the truth about the self, constituting the self as complete subject … is fantasy. In spite of the fact that autobiography is impossible, this in no way prevents it from existing” (pp. 131-132). Above all, autobiography is an invitation to reflect on the meaning of how, rather than what, we remember, and to muse on the manifold functions writing about the self perform. As such, it also offers us different ways of thinking about the dynamics of narrative self (co-)construction in clinical work. There's much for us to gain from autobiography scholars’ analyses and discussions, and from borrowing their ideas and hypotheses to consider spoken life narratives.

We listen to the content of our patients’ stories, but to gain a fuller sense of their experiences, we simultaneously pay attention to how these stories are told and what they reveal about the storytellers.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the article. PEP-Web provides full-text search of the complete articles for current and archive content, but only the abstracts are displayed for current content, due to contractual obligations with the journal publishers. For details on how to read the full text of 2017 and more current articles see the publishers official website here.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.