Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To access the PEP-Web Facebook pageā€¦

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

PEP-Web has a Facebook page! You can access it by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Trotter, A. (2019). Living Dreams or Dreaming Nightmares? Musings on an Increasingly Virtual Reality. Fort Da, 25(2):26-40.

(2019). Fort Da, 25(2):26-40

Living Dreams or Dreaming Nightmares? Musings on an Increasingly Virtual Reality

Amber Trotter, Psy.D.

Tech giants spend billions as they race to control a domain where the wildest artistry of our imaginations will seemingly be actualized. In virtual reality (VR), we will be able to experience “exploring Mars; living as a lobster; a close-up of your own beating heart, live” (Kelly, 2016). The potential applications of this new phenomenological substrate palpate with excitement, and extend to the clinical encounter.

This paper explores the particular analogy between immersive digital technologies, such as VR, and analytic dreaming — an analogy which, to my mind, forms the basis of much of the optimism surrounding virtual technologies in psychoanalytic literature (e.g., Caparotta & Lemma, 2013; Corbett, 2013; Hartman, 2011, 2012; Lingiardi, 2008). This analogy holds that, as with dreaming, immersive online experience permits phenomenological transcendence of material constraints and safe, creative experimentation with fantasies, ideas, and versions of self, including the most forbidden, dangerous, and improbable desires. Yet, further analysis raises questions. To begin with, VR's dreamlike experience often encodes as real: VR's full-color concreteness may end the analogy. VR participants also largely control their experience while using the technology, unlike their dreaming counterparts. Further, VR's content is prefabricated by powerful companies with economic and political agendas — agendas too often dissociated from analyses of tech. In this paper, I argue that although virtual technologies in many ways mimic analytic dreamwork, and can be used to amplify analytic dreamwork with particular clients, VR, in fact, constitutes a perversion of dreaming — a subtle, seductive, and pernicious co-option. I begin by elaborating analytic conceptions of dreamwork and perversion then move to an analysis of VR experiencing.

First, a note about “reality”: technology-mediated experience has become a ubiquitous new norm. Distinctions between virtual and actual experience can appear moot (Essig, 2012). An era marked by the “eradication of the boundary between plastic and flesh, wire and artery, computer and brain” (Knafo, 2015a, p. 481) upends longstanding conceptions of what is real.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the article. PEP-Web provides full-text search of the complete articles for current and archive content, but only the abstracts are displayed for current content, due to contractual obligations with the journal publishers. For details on how to read the full text of 2017 and more current articles see the publishers official website here.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.