Drescher, J. (1997). From Preoedipal to Postmodern: Changing Psychoanalytic Attitudes... Gender and Psychoanalysis, 2:203-216.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1997). Gender and Psychoanalysis, 2:203-216

From Preoedipal to Postmodern: Changing Psychoanalytic Attitudes toward Homosexuality


Jack Drescher, M.D. Author Information

New York University Postdoctoral Program's Conference, “Perspectives on Homosexuality: An Open Dialogue,” represented a sea-change in historic psychoanalytic attitudes toward homosexuality. Prior to that conference and the publication of Disorienting Sexuality most psychoanalytic relationships with lesbians and gay men were characterized by a broad range of emotional, intellectual, and theoretical attitudes and constructions that included professional ostracism, outright hostility, and patronizing compassion. The author, from the perspective of a gay male psychoanalyst, presents an overview of differing psychoanalytic attitudes toward homosexuality from the time of Freud through the present. The point is made that the inability of the psychoanalytic community to reflect openly on the discriminatory aspects of its distant and recent history has been a blind spot. The problem of speaking about homosexuality within a psychoanalytic framework has been limited by the absence of openly gay psychoanalysts. The paper defines some of the attitudes that prevented openly gay voices from contributing to the psychoanalytic dialogue about human sexuality.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2010, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.