Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To use Evernote for note taking…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Evernote is a general note taking application that integrates with your browser. You can use it to save entire articles, bookmark articles, take notes, and more. It comes in both a free version which has limited synchronization capabilities, and also a subscription version, which raises that limit. You can download Evernote for your computer here. It can be used online, and there’s an app for it as well.

Some of the things you can do with Evernote:

  • Save search-result lists
  • Save complete articles
  • Save bookmarks to articles


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Forter, G. (2006). Abu Ghraib, the Torture Memos, and the Psychosocial Dynamics of Torture: A Dossier. Int. J. Appl. Psychoanal. Stud., 3(2):168-176.

(2006). International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 3(2):168-176

Abu Ghraib, the Torture Memos, and the Psychosocial Dynamics of Torture: A Dossier

Greg Forter

What follows is a series of images and texts that served as the basis for discussion at one of the symposium's “open sessions” — sessions with no formal papers, whose aim was to enable relatively unstructured yet focused and sustained conversation about some aspect of the war. This particular session focused on the tortures at Abu Ghraib prison. As its facilitator, I juxtaposed some of the digital photographs of humiliated and violated Iraqi prisoners with excerpts from related texts and documents. Many of the latter were written or read by members of the Bush administration, and they thus contributed crucially to the discursive climate that made the tortures both possible and (for the administration) justifiable. Other texts included a passage from Philip Caputo's (1996) memoir of Vietnam, Rumor of War, and, in a section of the session on critiques of Abu Ghraib, a piece of political satire by Rod Corddry (2004) of The Daily Show with Jon Stewart - the comedy program that offered some of the most consistently incisive criticisms of the war.

The session elicited especially intense affective responses from participants and the “audience” (the distinction was particularly porous in open sessions). These reactions emerged, first, in response to an initial viewing of the images. Some described their response to this viewing as a “dissociation” that suggested how much the photos continue to have the power to traumatize their viewers. Others spoke of intense anxiety, of a nameless dread that seemed to result from their empathic identification with the victims. Still others expressed anger, guilt, and shame at belonging to a nation that could do such things “in our name.”

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.