Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article.  Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

(2017). Dr. Boulanger Responds. Int. J. Appl. Psychoanal. Stud., 14(3):165-166.

(2017). International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 14(3):165-166

Dr. Boulanger Responds Related Papers

I am glad that Drs. Puente and Evans have taken this opportunity to offer more details about the changes that the American Psychological Association has instituted in the years since the Hoffman report was made available in 2015.

However, it is of some concern that, in pointing to “misrepresentations” in my introduction, Drs. Puente and Evans adopt a strategy similar to the one that the APA has used in answering their critics over these last many years. In pointing out that changes to the APA's ethics code were, in fact, planned prior to 9/11 (I note again that these changes directed psychologists to adhere to the requirements of the law, regulations, or other governing legal authority rather than to their professional ethical responsibilities), Drs. Puente and Evans do not comment on my point that these ‘meaningful’ changes, as they call them, were in direct opposition to the International Code of Ethics. Whether the changes to the APA's ethics code took place after 9/11 or were in the planning phase at that point, these regressive changes demonstrated that the association had elected to set itself apart from other professional medical associations not only in America, but in the rest of the civilized world. This rhetorical style, with its careful attention to detail while ignoring the substance of the argument, is disingenuous.

Let me address the second point that Puente and Evans make, namely that the APA took many steps to implement the 2008 referendum

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2018, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.