Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To quickly return to the issue’s Table of Contents from an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can go back to to the issue’s Table of Contents in one click by clicking on the article title in the article view. What’s more, it will take you to the specific place in the TOC where the article appears.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Roheim, G. (1922). The Group Mind: By William McDougall M.B., F.R.S. (Cambridge University Press, 1921. Pp. 304. Price 21s.). Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 3:99-109.

(1922). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 3:99-109

The Group Mind: By William McDougall M.B., F.R.S. (Cambridge University Press, 1921. Pp. 304. Price 21s.)

Review by:
G. Roheim

The most remarkable thing about books that deal with the 'Group Mind' is that they are frequently difficult to distinguish from the leading articles of a daily paper. Mr. McDougall's book is not one of these that err the most in this line, but still, from a purely scientific point of view, we must ask why the author finds it necessary to state that 'politically, my sympathies are with individualism and internationalism, although I have, I think, fully recognized the great and necessary part played in human life by the "Group Spirit" and by that special form of it which we now call nationalism' (p. xi Preface). What have 'sympathies' to do with the topics in question, which concern a department of applied psychology, localised on the border-line between psychology and social anthropology or sociology? We do not generally 'sympathise' with totemism or animism: why should we not be able to adhere to this 'désintéressement' when discussing other questions of collective psychology? The father of sociology, Herbert Spencer, has given us a book (the Study of Sociology) in which the authors of books on this subject might see, as in a mirror held before their eyes, how nation and party distort their view of facts. But it has had remarkably little effect on them and books are still written, calling themselves scientific, which try to show that one nation was 'wrong', another 'right', that certain politics are 'justified', others 'condemned', by science. The superiority of the British type of social organisation over the German is one of the leading themes of W.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.