Login
Róheim, G. (1936). Sex and Culture: By I. D. Unwin. (Oxford University Press, 1934. Pp. 677. Price 36 s.). Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 17:243-245.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1936). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 17:243-245

Sex and Culture: By I. D. Unwin. (Oxford University Press, 1934. Pp. 677. Price 36 s.)

Géza Róheim

In reviewing this book I would rather stress the question of method than the conclusions drawn by the author. The author is trying to demonstrate that societies are either 'zoistic' or 'manistic' or 'deistic', that these forms of society represent phases of cultural evolution and are in a definite correlation with the reduction of sexual opportunity. It will strike the anthropologist that this classification is arbitrary. Why should we regard the form in which the concept of the super-natural appears in a certain area as the only important feature in classifying a society? Moreover the classification itself is extremely doubtful. Supernatural beings are usually 'zoistic', 'manistic' and 'divine' at the same time and not either one thing or the other. These categories are familiar to all students of anthropology: we know them as 'animalistisch', 'manistisch', 'solar' in one of the early publications of Frobenius. We are told that the Trobriand Islanders are 'zoistic' (p. 105). As they have prenuptial sexual freedom they must be zoistic, according to Dr. Unwin's main theory. However, the rôle played by totemism is slight indeed in this society, 'but the harvest period is directly followed by the mila-mila, the animal feast associated with the return of ancestral spirits to the village' (Malinowski). But I can talk with more authority on an area I know personally. Dobu and Duau are very similar culturally to the Trobriands. If a society is called 'manistic'

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.