Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: Downloads should look similar to the originals…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Downloadable content in PDF and ePUB was designed to be read in a similar format to the original articles.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Devereux, G. (1953). Why Oedipus Killed Laius—A Note on the Complementary Oedipus Complex in Greek Drama. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 34:132-141.

(1953). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 34:132-141

Why Oedipus Killed Laius—A Note on the Complementary Oedipus Complex in Greek Drama

George Devereux, Ph.D.

It is striking to note that psycho-analytic theory pays exceedingly little attention to certain complexes which, in a very genuine sense, complement the Oedipus complex. In particular, even though occasionally reference is made (13) to the tender and even to the erotic components of what may be called the Laius complex and the Jocasta complex, the sadistic (and homosexual) components of these complexes are, generally speaking, ignored by psycho-analytic writers. Indeed, there exist certain Greek traditions regarding Laius which suggest that the complementary Oedipus complex, even in its homosexual and sadistic phases, was close enough to the threshold of consciousness to receive at least a mythological expression. Yet even Rank (20), who specifically discusses these traditions, fails to stress that they provide us with a highly specific and 'historical', rather than only with a general and 'paleopsychological', explanation of Laius' behaviour towards the infant Oedipus.

It must be assumed that this continued scotomization of the complementary Oedipus complex is rooted in the adult's deep-seated need to place all responsibility for the Oedipus complex upon the child, and to ignore, whenever possible, certain parental attitudes which actually stimulate the infant's oedipal tendencies. This deliberate scotoma is probably rooted in the authoritarian atmosphere characteristic of nineteenth-century family life. This interpretation is supported by the history of Freud's thoughts on the subject of the etiology of hysteria.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.