Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To copy parts of an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To copy a phrase, paragraph, or large section of an article, highlight the text with the mouse and press Ctrl + C. Then to paste it, go to your text editor and press Ctrl + V.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Spiegel, L.A. (1957). Concept of Probability and Esp. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 38:438.

(1957). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 38:438

Concept of Probability and Esp

Leo Angelo Spiegel, M.D.

SIR,

In connection with the recent discussion on Extra-Sensory Perception (ESP) I would like to draw attention to some aspects of the concept of probability, for it is indeed on this concept that the believers in ESP rest their claims. In this communication, neither the data nor their interpretation are of primary interest to me.

Let me at once grant the proponents of ESP their main point; the evidence they present cannot be explained by chance. Then what? What meaning can we attach to the statement that the findings are due to non-chance? The matter is not as simple as the proponents of ESP would have us believe. They imply that since the evidence cannot be explained as non-chance, it must be explained on the basis of some lawful causality. This however is a basic error in logic.

The thinking of P. W. Bridgman on this question is of singular interest to all those concerned with ESP. I will quote the essential points he makes.

'We have to ask what we mean when we say "this event was not chance." Since we have already made an attempt to tell what we mean when we say "this event was chance", we might be tempted to think that our new question is trivial and that its answer is implied in the answer we have already given. I think, however, and this is perhaps the crux of this note, that this is by no means the case. "Was chance" and "was not chance" are not simply related to each other as two terms in traditional Aristotelian logic, subject to the rule of the excluded middle.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.